DADAJI DHUNIWALE WALLPAPER

dadaji dhuniwale

We were informed that the University has already verified the eligibility criteria of the respective students admitted in the petitioner-College. As a result, the petitioner has challenged that decision by way of writ petition No. At this stage, counsel for the University submits that the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner that the University has already verified the eligibility aspects of students of petitioner-College is incorrect. Para 36 of the said decision reads thus: By consent, matters are taken up for final disposal as short question is involved and also because of the urgency involved, which has arisen on account of the stand taken by the University of not allowing the students admitted in the petitioner – College i. Besides the fact that the petitioner has failed to substantiate the only ground urged to oppose extension of permission, but, we are of the opinion that larger public interest commends us to reject this petition – as entertaining this petition would inevitably jeopardize the career of not less than students, who are pursuing the different technical Engineering Courses in the petitioner-College. The AICTE while processing the application for grant of approval to the petitioner-College for the academic year found that the proposal was acceptable on all parameters but still declined to grant approval only on one count – as can be discerned from the impugned order dated 30th June,

Name: Dasar
Format: JPEG, PNG
License: For Personal Use Only
iPhone 5, 5S resolutions 640×1136
iPhone 6, 6S resolutions 750×1334
iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions 1080×1920
Android Mobiles HD resolutions 360×640, 540×960, 720×1280
Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions 1080×1920
Mobiles HD resolutions 480×800, 768×1280
Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions 1440×2560
HD resolutions 1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original

At this stage, counsel for the University submits that the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner that the University has already verified the eligibility aspects of students of petitioner-College is incorrect. Registry shall forward copy of this judgment to the Registrar of Rajiv Gandhi Prodyogiki Vishwa Vidyalaya, Bhopal by e-mail and fax for information and necessary action.

Shri Daddaji Institute of 2 Technology and Science to appear in the examinations for the academic year In respect of rural area, the requirement as specified in dadaki Handbook Clause 4.

Pincode of DADAJI DHUNIWALE COLONY CHHINDWARA MADHYA PRADESH

The petitioner-college has fulfilled all the conditions specified by AICTE for allowing it to continue since then. We were informed that the University has already verified the eligibility criteria of the respective students admitted in the petitioner-College.

  LEXUS IS300H WALLPAPER

The petitioner, who has filed public interest litigation to oppose grant of extension to the subject College is not in a position to point out any statutory provision in the form of Act or Rules or for that matter Regulations made by AICTE under the Act having statutory force, which require the College established in the academic dxdaji to possess contiguous land more than 2.

The AICTE while processing the application for grant of approval to the petitioner-College for the academic year found that the proposal was acceptable on all parameters but still declined to grant approval only on one count – as can be discerned from the impugned order dated 30th June, Dadajl submits that the verification can xhuniwale done by the University, if already not done. Besides the fact that the petitioner has failed to substantiate the only ground urged to oppose extension of permission, but, we are of the opinion that larger public interest commends us to reject this petition – as entertaining this petition would inevitably jeopardize dhujiwale career of not less than students, who are pursuing the different technical Engineering Courses in the petitioner-College.

Therefore, the principal question that arises in the present writ petitions is: As a result, the petitioner has challenged that decision by way of writ petition No.

It is for the University to decide about the dates on which Supplementary Examination will be conducted with regard to those subjects.

By consent, matters are taken up for final disposal as short question is involved and also because of the urgency involved, which has arisen on account of the stand taken by the University of not allowing the students admitted in the petitioner – College i.

With regard to examination of subjects already completed by the University, the concerned students be permitted to appear in the Supplementary Examination to be conducted by the University in that behalf.

For any reason, the hall tickets are not issued to the students to enable them to appear in the examination to be conducted on 9th January,the University must 9 ensure that the hall ticket for the dhumiwale of the remaining subjects from 11th January, is issued to the concerned eligible students, at least, by tomorrow Being prima facie satisfied with the grounds urged in the writ petition, this Court permitted the petitioner-college to participate in the counseling process and to admit students selected during that process for the academic year The reason recorded in the impugned decision is that the Supreme Court has fixed the last date for grant vadaji approval as 30th April, and for which reason it was not feasible to consider the proposal of the petitioner-College in the current academic year at this belated stage.

  FOR ROKR E6 WALLPAPERS

The petitioner-college does not fulfill that requirement. Understood thus, the petition filed by the public spirited addaji does not merit consideration.

Shri Shri 1008 Shri Dadaji Dhuniwaley

The argument proceeds that the petitioner-college is situated outside the Corporation limits. The matter does not rest with this judgment as some 6 public spirited person has filed writ petition as public interest litigation to question the decision of AICTE on the ground that AICTE dhunwiale overlooked shuniwale crucial aspect about the total land holding of the petitioner-college to qualify to get permission or for that matter extension of approval.

In the first writ petition, the decision hduniwale respondent No. In our opinion, the University must act upon this judgment and proceed on the basis that AICTE has already issued extension permission in favour of the petitioner-College and thus permit the students of petitioner-College to appear in the examination of remaining subjects from 9th January, by issuing hall tickets to the respective eligible students.

Para 36 of the said decision reads thus: Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

Aarti Dadaji Ki

College through Centralized counseling for academic year cannot be permitted to appear in the examination scheduled to be commenced from That takes us to the second writ petition filed by the petitioner-college, being W. Try out our Premium Member services: This petition is, essentially, sequel to the stand rhuniwale by the University that the students admitted in the petitioner.

The petitioner-institute, accordingly, admitted around students, who have completed the technical course for that 3 year. That may be expedited; and, in cases where such verification is not done, must be completed by tomorrow before issuance of hall tickets to the concerned students.

Author: admin